Sunday, December 11, 2011

The Ponzi Thief Who Picked Judges

Where do judges come from?

From Marybeth Feiss, of course.

Feiss, according to federal investigators, ran the fraudulent political contribution scheme that enabled her bombastic, absurdly grandiose, insanely ostentatious Ponzi thief of a boss, among other outrages, to buy himself a seat on the state judicial nominating committee.

Feiss, 42, was charged last week with bundling hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal campaign contributions from 2006 through 2009 at the behest of the infamous scammer Scott Rothstein. Some $3 million was funneled to local, state and federal candidates and political parties, much of it illegally, through lawyers and employees (and their spouses) of his now-defunct Las Olas Boulevard law firm, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler.

The criminal complaint, filed Thursday (exactly two years after the feds arrested Rothstein), states: “It was the object of the conspiracy that Rothstein and his co-conspirators, including Feiss, aimed to dramatically increase the political influence and power of RRA and become one of the most powerful law firms in the country by utilizing some of the attorneys and administrative personnel of RRA and other persons associated with RRA to unlawfully make prohibited political contributions.” Rothstein reimbursed his minions for the contributions, much of it in the guise of bonuses.

John Gillies, the head of the FBI office in South Florida, put it a bit more succinctly. With Feiss, his administrative assistant, doing what assistants do, Gillies said, “Rothstein tried to buy political influence with the money he stole from the Ponzi scheme to contribute millions of dollars to political campaigns.”

But Rothstein didn’t just try to buy political influence. He outright bought it.

Full Article and Source:
The Ponzi Thief Who Picked Judges

2 comments:

StandUp said...

It makes one wonder how many judges are picked for lesser amounts.

Anonymous said...

Please investigate a Pierce County Judge Katherine Stolz for not revealing her conflict of interest of parties to hear the case of Gerildine Strege. Follow the money. Pierce County Judge Katherine Stolz had no athourity to theaten an interested party. Katherine Stolz should be held responsible. But is the Government for which Gerildine and her husband Melvin Strege served in time of World War willing to serve Life , Liberty , and the persuit of happiness? Gerildine served for injured soldiers, and Melvin marched along General Patton's soidiers along with Melvin's friends killed during these battles. A small battle to ask of the United States for a extremly important World War fought by Melvin Strege and other soldiers deserving of respect for what they gave to this great country of the United States of America. Please help, to the Honerable President of the United States of America, Barrack Obama. Jeff