Thursday, April 12, 2012

Abolishing Judicial Immunity

I realize that abolishing judicial immunity opens up an entire new “can of worms”, but this must be accomplished.

(I am busy “holding the wolves at bay” in all the various suits, etc. I face as a result of my ill-founded and illegal conservatorship)

When I have more time to consider this topic, I will present to you how we can effectively abolish judicial immunity and control the “tsunami” of law suits that would tend to follow.

Abolishing judicial immunity would have an immediate and definitive impact on judicial conduct, and do more for correcting the now-listing ship of our judiciary than any new form of “COJ” [Court of the Judiciary] could accomplish, though I do believe I’ve offered a substantial proposal of composition for a new governing body that represents Constitutional intent, and we would still need a judicial governing “watch dog” body.

I believe abolishing judicial immunity is consistent with the founding father’s intent [TN Constitution Judicial Election and Selection], and would ultimately stream-line government as well as bring immediate correction, governed by conscience as opposed to rule.

Full Article and Source:
Pauper v Probate: Abolishing Judicial Immunity

7 comments:

Thelma said...

I love that headline on top of that face.

StandUp said...

Exactly! If TN is going to clean up its act, judicial immunity must go!

B Inberg said...

Immunity is deadly maybe not so bad decades ago but as we know all bad things get worse people don't realize how they are affected and if they end up in a courtroom ~~~ well, now they are in the front lines. Many judges are the best of the best but when a judge goes bad and it's impossible to get rid of him or her because of the design of the system and then we are forced to work around immunity protections, we have a national disaster that is lethal making a mockery out of our judicial system. No fairness in the court ~~ then we have NOTHING but a broken down 3rd world corrupt system.

Finny said...

I believe Judge Randy Kennedy should not be immune for what he did in Danny Tate's case. He rubberstamped unlawful acts, knowingly and willingly. In my opinion, he should be disbarred.

Anonymous said...

Judges in Cook County Illinois knowingly allow the financial exploitation of the elderly and disabled. Predatory guardianships are abundant. Court-sanctioned elder abuse must end. Judicial immunity is the reason these crimes occur. Endig judicial immunity is needed to protect the elderly and disabled in Cook County (Chicago) Illinois, and in other corrupt court systems throughout the country.

Anonymous said...

We support efforts to abolish judicial and qualified immunity. Our organization reaches hundreds of thousands of visitors. Please visit us on WWW. Net4TruthUSA.com/abovethelaw.htm and follow all the relevant links. America needs to put corrupt judges in prison see WWW.Net4TruthUSA.com/jailforjudges.htm

When you make peaceful protest impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable - JFK

JERRY ONEAL said...

CHECK OUT THIS SITE 47BGONE.COM
THE SITE PROVIDES CLEAR EVIDENCE OF JUDICAL CORRUPTION THAT HAS SWINDLED OVER 500,000,000.00 FROM THE WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA