Friday, January 18, 2013

Disability Rights Ohio Declares Victory in Groundbreaking Case: Right to Counsel for Those Under Guardianship Upheld by Ohio Supreme Court

Today, the Ohion Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the right of individuals under guardianship to be represented by a court-appointed lawyer during review hearings to determine whether they continue to need a guardian. Disability Rights Ohio brought this case on behalf of Mr. James McQueen, who resides in a locked nursing facility in Cuyahoga County by order of his court-appointed guardian, who is neither a family member nor a friend. Mr. McQueen no longer wishes to live in the facility and had applied for a review of his case to end guardianship.

Under Ohio law, a guardian is appointed for someone who can no longer make his or her own decisions. Once guardianship is granted, the ward loses legal power over his or her own affairs. Given this significant removal of individual rights, citizens in Ohio have long had a right to an attorney before a guardian is appointed. This case breaks new ground by affirming the continued right of these individuals to a lawyer at all subsequent review hearings. Mr. McQueen will now receive his day in court with an attorney.

“This landmark decision will have a lasting statewide impact,” says Kerstin Sjoberg-Witt, Legal Director of Disability Rights Ohio. “Anyone under a guardianship, both currently and in the future, now has a clear legal right to an attorney when challenging the need for a guardian.”

The court’s decision was unanimous. All of the Justices agreed that the right to a review hearing included the right to a court-appointed attorney under R.C. 2111.49(C) (emphasis added): “a hearing shall be held in accordance with section 2111.02 of the Revised Code to evaluate the continued necessity of the guardianship.” Therefore, to not provide an attorney would make the “accordance with” language “meaningless.”

Additional language in the ruling clarified that where the law provides for an appointed attorney, mandamus is an appropriate avenue to use when a lower court fails to appoint an attorney. Mandamus is a legal remedy that forces a court or other government entity to uphold a law or make a ruling on a law as written.

Full Article and Source:
Disability Rights Ohio declares victory in groundbreaking case: Right to counsel for those under guardianship upheld by Ohio Supreme Court

See Also;
READ State ex rel. McQueen v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Please, Probate Div., Slip Opinion No. 2013-Ohio-65

5 comments:

Finny said...

Congratulations Disability Rights! Indeed this is a victory to celebrate!

Sara Harvey said...

Congradulations!!! now how about those who have an attorney but are not being represented? Like my husband Gary Harvey who his appointed attorney keeps insisting that our visits together must be restricted.

No merit to my husband's attorney's quest. Just because he may not like me. Basing his assertation on a personal agenda.

StandUp said...

It's an improvement. People stuck in guardianship can't get out by themselves.

Having a lawyer, even if that person is court-appointed, is a good start!

Congratulations Disability Rights!

Carole said...

Yea for Ohio!

Sue said...

Independent counsel is what is needed not a friend of the court who might be beholding to the probate club. We need to pay attention because we're next.